Court to decide Yingluck's fate

The Constitutional Court yesterday agreed to rule on the status of caretaker Prime Minister Yingluck Shinawatra over the removal order she issued against NSC chief Thawil Pliensri, (photo) a move angry government supporters say could pave the way for a "judicial coup".

Please join us on our Facebook page http://www.facebook.com/bangkokpostlearning

On March 10, twenty-seven senators led by Paiboon Nititawan (left-centre) petitioned the Senate Speaker to ask the Constitutional Court to rule if Ms Yingluck's premiership is still valid under Section 182 (7) of the constitution after the Supreme Administration Court ruling. They claimed Ms Yingluck might have violated Section 268 of the constitution in connection with the transfer of Mr Thawil Pliensri. Yesterday, the Court accepted the petition for consideration. APICHART JINAKUL

Tensions on rise after court decision

King-oua Laohong and Aekarach Sattaburuth

Tension is expected to build after the Constitutional Court yesterday agreed to rule on the status of caretaker Prime Minister Yingluck Shinawatra over the removal order she issued against National Security Council (NSC) chief Thawil Pliensri.

Several government figures are warning the court's decision to consider if Ms Yingluck has breached the constitution in the Thawil case will bring the country closer to a violent confrontation. They say the court's rulings are not quite in line with the charter.

In its unanimous decision yesterday, the court affirmed its authority to consider the Thawil case that was submitted by a group of senators led by Paiboon Nititawan.

The petition contends that Ms Yingluck violated Section 266 and Section 286 when she signed the order transferring Mr Thawil to be prime ministerial adviser in 2011. It asks the court to rule if she must leave her post as stated in Section 182.

Section 266 bans MPs and senators from using their posts to interfere, directly or indirectly, in the work of state officials or in their transfer for personal gain or for interest of others while Section 268 says the ban in Section 266 applies to the prime minister unless he or she performs in accordance with policies addressed in parliament. Section 182 says the premier must leave office if there is a breach of Section 268.

According to the senators' petition, the transfer was not in the public's best interests, but was an attempt to find a position for ex-national police chief Wichean Potephosree so the government could appoint its own man to the police chief's job.

After Pol Gen Wichean replaced Mr Thawil as the NSC secretary-general, the national police chief post was filled by Pol Gen Priewpan Damapong, the elder brother of Khunying Potjaman na Pombejra, Thaksin Shinawatra's ex-wife.

Mr Paiboon and his colleagues cited a Supreme Administrative Court ruling to back their request for the ruling on Ms Yingluck's status.

Thawil Pliensri talks to the media after the Supreme Administrative Court ruled that his removal as national security chief was unlawful. TAWATCHAI KHEMGUMNERD

In its ruling, the court said the prime minister's judgement was unlawful and ordered Mr Thawil reinstated. The transfer orders were not in line with government policies announced in parliament. Ms Yingluck will have 15 days to lodge her defence after getting a copy of the petition.

Caretaker Education Minister Chaturon Chaisaeng conceded a negative ruling by the Constitutional Court would bring down the Yingluck administration faster than the rice-pledging scheme.

"The Thawil case will be a knock-out punch and make [the government] go faster. But it is hard to say if it will play out that way. If the court rules along these lines, the country will be in trouble.

"Things will look really bad if an 'outsider' government takes office. There will be fierce objections," he said.

Mr Chaturon said the Constitutional Court has so far ruled as it pleases, rather than going by the charter.

"If it rules against the government it could all come to an end this month, perhaps before Songkran," he said.

Pheu Thai legal specialist Pichit Chuenban cried foul over the court's decision to accept the case. He said it was extraordinary for two courts to repeatedly scrutinise the prime minister's exercise of power.

Mr Pichit said the move was undermining the balance of power between the three branches.

Meanwhile, Mr Paiboon said he expects the court to make a decision in two weeks because the case is not complicated and there is no need to hold further hearings.

He said that if Ms Yingluck is ordered to leave office, without the House to select a prime minister, Section 7 is likely to be invoked to find a new prime minister who will have full authority.

According to Mr Paiboon, the caretaker government would not have to leave office even if the court rules against the prime minister. It will have to leave only if a new prime minister appoints a new cabinet.

สามารถฝึกอ่านออกเสียงและดูคำแปลได้ที่ : http://www.bangkokpost.com/learning/learning-from-news/403232/court-to-decide-yingluck-fate